LJS-MikeRobinson-cropped

 

ackermann_photogenic
The firm of Ackermann & Co. grew from most unlikely roots. Rudolph Ackermann (1764-1834) was a saddler in Saxony before moving to London in his early twenties. This was the British centre of coach building and Ackermann soon emerged as a fine and inventive craftsman. Possessed of a flair for self promotion, in 1791 he published Imitations of Drawings of Fashionable Carriages in order to promote his wares. That led him into the new world of lithography and from there to stationery supplies and colours for artists. His growing firm began to publish the heavily illustrated Repository of Arts, Literature, Fashions and manuals for artists, including Léon Mansion’s Letters Upon the Art of Miniature Painting. His successors expanded the business further, so in 1839 it was natural that the firm became a purveyor of supplies for the new art of photography.

 

There are many curious or downright enigmatic photographs in Henry Talbot’s archive, most devoid of inscriptions and with few clues as to when or why they were made. No prints are known to exist for this diminutive calotype negative.

SC4289_1937-4302-neg-vpCalotype negative – digital print
Perhaps no prints were required. Was Ackermann’s colour chart merely a convenient test subject, perhaps used to reveal the edge sharpness of a lens?
DOC_1937-4302-vp-pins
This sort of test, still being done in the digital age, will be familiar to many photographers.  Talbot was a customer of Ackermann’s long before photography and he (or his wife or sisters) may have had this colour chart for their own watercolours.  However, Talbot himself would have had little need for such a test, or indeed, for a watercolour chart at all.  I think it more likely that the negative was done by Nicolaas Henneman in his photographic establishment at Reading.
But even then a lens test seems an unlikely explanation for this image.  Four hastily-placed thumbtacks hold the top and sides of the placard flat, but they were omitted on the bottom, allowing the card to curl up, perhaps accidentally during the exposure.  The colour patches were probably made on separate sheets of paper and pasted on the card, a lamination sure to stress the flatness when the humidity changed.
As has been explained before, early photographic materials were sensitive primarily to light at the blue end of the spectrum.  Other colours were rendered quite differently from what we might expect. I think that probably Henneman was using this colourful chart to see how various tints were rendered by his calotype negative material.  Such knowledge would have been useful for copying works of art, one of the most promising markets for photography.  Perhaps it was even in preparation for making the illustrations for Stirling Maxwell’s Annals of the Artists of Spain?
In more recent times, the Toronto-based Daguerreotypist, Mike Robinson, produced a similar ‘test chart’ using his metal process – the results parallel those of the calotype above.
DaguerreotypeColors-MikeRobinson

pointing-finger-blog- f9f5eeI’ve never been able to trace an original of this particular Ackermann’s display card.  Surely one must have survived.  If you know of a copy in a museum or ephemera collection please point me towards it.

 

Larry J Schaaf

henry-small

• Questions or Comments? Please contact Prof Schaaf directly at larry.schaaf@bodleian.ox.ac.uk  • The facsimile of Ackermann’s booklet illustrated was published by the Royal Photographic Society Historical Group in 1977.   • Attributed to Nicolaas Henneman, Copy of an Ackermann’s Colour Chart, calotype negative, mid-1840s, National Science and Media Museum, Bradford, 1937-4302, Schaaf 4289.